Energy Register
Site classes · Car park, data room, plant room and unattended asset

Battery

The asset exists to flex: it charges when energy is cheap and discharges into the peak, and every hour it sits on a flat tariff is the reason it was bought going unused.

How the register reads it

Also calledBESS, energy storage
FamilyAssets with nobody there: car parks with chargers, data rooms, plant rooms, batteries and pumping stations. They are often unmetered or estimated by rating, they are the sites most often missing from a register, and the battery and the chargers are the assets that can flex.
Typical suppliesbattery storage own storage, grid electricity category 2. A line that names its supply overrides the class.
Controllable loadYes
Annual kWh bandMid band, typically tens to a few hundred thousand kWh a year. The figure on the line is what the register uses; the band decides only which baseline rows attach when the line carries no figure.
Contract focusThe pass-through or time-of-use tariff, the export arrangement and the interval meter on the connection.
Programme readingA line reads can take part where the meter is an interval meter, the tariff pays for flexibility and the country names a programme; otherwise the one missing condition is named: no interval data, tariff does not pay or no named programme.
Example line, as pastedBattery Truganina

What each regime attaches

29 clauses across 5 regimes, on the class defaults

Shown on a register for the regimes you tick, by the supply, meter, tariff, family and band the line states; with none ticked, the ISO 50001 and ISO 14064-1 rows are the default.

ISO 50001:2018, energy management systems

Attaches to every supply point: the scope that excludes no energy type, the energy review and its significant energy uses, the data collection plan and the monitoring minimum on every line, the baseline on the top-band sites, procurement on every contract and design on every generation or storage asset. With nothing ticked these rows render as the default.

ISO 50001 4.3 Determining the scope of the energy management system

Determine the boundaries and applicability of the EnMS, considering the issues of 4.1 and the requirements of 4.2; ensure authority to control energy efficiency, use and consumption within the scope and boundaries; do not exclude any energy type within them; maintain the scope and boundaries as documented information.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Documented EnMS scope and boundaries
Common gap: An energy type excluded from the scope
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 6.3 Energy review

Develop and conduct an energy review: analyse energy use and consumption from measurement and other data, identifying current energy types and evaluating past and current energy uses and consumption; identify the significant energy uses (SEUs); for each SEU determine relevant variables, determine current energy performance and identify the persons under the ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Energy review with data analysis, SEU list, relevant variables, opportunities and future estimate; Documented methods and criteria
Common gap: SEUs chosen without a documented significance criterion
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 6.4 Energy performance indicators

Determine EnPIs that are appropriate for measuring and monitoring energy performance and enable the organization to demonstrate energy performance improvement; maintain the method for determining and updating them as documented information; where data show that relevant variables significantly affect energy performance, consider that data in establishing the...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Documented EnPI method and EnPI values with comparison to baselines
Common gap: EnPIs that cannot show improvement (absolute consumption with no normalization)
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 6.6 Planning for collection of energy data

Ensure the key characteristics of operations affecting energy performance are identified, measured, monitored and analysed at planned intervals; define and implement an energy data collection plan appropriate to size, complexity, resources and measurement equipment, specifying the data needed to monitor the key characteristics and how and how often they are ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Energy data collection plan with the five data classes; Calibration or verification records for measurement equipment
Common gap: Data plan that omits static factors
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 8.1 Operational planning and control

Plan, implement and control the processes related to the SEUs that are needed to meet requirements and implement the actions of 6.2, by establishing criteria for the processes including effective operation and maintenance of facilities, equipment, systems and energy-using processes where their absence can lead to a significant deviation from intended energy ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Operating and maintenance criteria for SEUs; Change control records; Controls over outsourced SEUs
Common gap: Maintenance of SEU equipment left to a general schedule with no energy criteria
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 8.2 Design

Consider energy performance improvement opportunities and operational control in the design of new, modified and renovated facilities, equipment, systems and energy-using processes that can significantly impact energy performance over their planned or expected operating lifetime; where applicable incorporate the results into specification, design and procure...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Design reviews recording energy performance consideration over the lifetime
Common gap: Energy performance considered after the design is fixed
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 8.3 Procurement

Establish and implement criteria for evaluating energy performance over the planned or expected operating lifetime when procuring energy-using products, equipment and services expected to have a significant impact on energy performance; when procuring products, equipment and services that have or can have an impact on SEUs, inform suppliers that energy perfo...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Procurement criteria for lifetime energy performance; Supplier notifications; Energy purchase specifications
Common gap: Equipment bought on capital cost with no lifetime energy evaluation
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018
ISO 50001 9.1.1 General

Determine for energy performance and the EnMS what needs to be monitored and measured, including at a minimum the effectiveness of action plans in achieving objectives and energy targets, the EnPIs, the operation of SEUs and actual versus expected energy consumption; the methods to ensure valid results; when monitoring and measurement are performed; and when...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Monitoring records for the four key characteristics; EnPI versus EnB evaluations; Significant deviation investigations
Common gap: Actual versus expected consumption never compared
Framework page: ISO 50001:2018

ISO 14064-1:2018, the organization-level inventory (parts 2 and 3 held beside it)

Attaches to every supply point: the boundaries, the source register, information management and the report contents on every line; category 1 on the fuel lines, category 2 and Annex E on the imported ones, the export rule on generation, uncertainty on the estimated ones and the base year on the largest sites. The register quantifies nothing: it names the category and the clause that says how the figure would be made.

ISO 14064-1 part 1, 5.1 5.1 Organizational boundaries

The organization shall define its organizational boundaries and consolidate facility-level emissions and removals by the control approach (all emissions from facilities under its financial or operational control) or the equity share approach (its portion from each facility), consistent with the intended use of the inventory; different approaches may serve di...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Documented consolidation approach and the facility list it produces
Common gap: Control and equity share mixed without saying so
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 5.2.1 5.2.1 Establishing reporting boundaries

The organization shall establish and document its reporting boundaries, identifying the direct and indirect emissions and removals associated with its operations.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Reporting boundary documentation
Common gap: Boundary defined by what data was easy to get
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 5.2.3 5.2.3 Indirect GHG emissions

The organization shall apply and document a process to determine which indirect emissions to include, defining and explaining its own predetermined significance criteria in the light of the intended use (magnitude, influence, access to information, data accuracy; a risk assessment may be used), which should not be used to exclude substantial quantities or ev...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Significance criteria and the evaluation of each indirect emission category against them; Justification for exclusions
Common gap: Significance decided after seeing the numbers
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 5.2.4 5.2.4 GHG inventory categories

Emissions shall be aggregated at organization level into six categories: direct emissions and removals; indirect emissions from imported energy; from transportation; from products used by the organization; associated with the use of the organization's products; and from other sources; in each category non-biogenic, biogenic anthropogenic and, if quantified, ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Inventory table in the six categories with the biogenic split
Common gap: Scope 1, 2, 3 labels used without mapping to the six categories
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 6.1 6.1 Identification of GHG sources and sinks

The organization shall identify and document all relevant sources and sinks within its reporting boundaries, including all relevant GHGs, in the categories of 5.2.4, at a level of detail consistent with the quantification approach; sinks shall be identified where removals are quantified; sources or sinks whose contribution is not relevant may be excluded, wi...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Source and sink register by category with exclusions explained
Common gap: Exclusions not explained
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 6.3 6.3 Calculation of GHG emissions and removals

The organization shall calculate emissions and removals per the selected approach, report the period covered, convert each GHG to tonnes of CO2e with appropriate GWPs (the latest IPCC values should be used, otherwise justified) on a 100-year horizon (other horizons reported separately), quantify biogenic emissions and removals per Annex D, and quantify impor...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Calculation records with the GWP set and horizon
Common gap: Mixed GWP sources across the inventory
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 8.1 8.1 GHG information management

The organization shall establish and maintain information management procedures that ensure conformity with the principles and consistency with the intended use, provide routine checks for accuracy and completeness, identify and address errors and omissions, and document and archive records including GWPs; the procedures shall document their consideration of...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Information management procedures covering the eleven considerations; Accuracy check and internal audit records
Common gap: Checks performed but not documented
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, 9.3.1 9.3.1 GHG report: required information

The report shall include the organization description, the person responsible, the period, the organizational and reporting boundaries with the significance criteria, direct emissions by gas, the treatment and separate quantity of biogenic CO2, direct removals if quantified, explanation of excluded significant sources or sinks, indirect emissions by category...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Report checked against the twenty required items
Common gap: No verification disclosure
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018
ISO 14064-1 part 1, E.2 E.2 Treatment of imported electricity

Emissions from imported electricity consumed shall be quantified by the location-based approach using the emission factor that best characterises the pertinent grid (dedicated line, local, regional or national average consumption mix), preferably for the reporting year; indirect emissions such as transmission losses and upstream processes should be quantifie...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Location-based calculation with the grid factor source; Contractual instrument quality assessment where market-based figures are reported
Common gap: Market-based figure reported as the inventory figure
Framework page: ISO 14064-1:2018

ISO 14001:2026, environmental management systems

Attaches the environmental aspects, the compliance obligations and the monitoring clauses to every supply point, operational control to the fuel and imported supplies and the contracts, the objectives to the plant and logistics sites, and the compliance evaluation to the register as a whole.

ISO 14001 6.1.2 Environmental aspects

Within the defined scope, the organization shall determine the environmental aspects of its activities, products and services that it can control and those it can influence, and their associated environmental impacts, considering a life cycle perspective that covers acquisition of raw materials, design, production, transportation and delivery, use, end-of-li...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Aspects and impacts register covering normal, abnormal and emergency conditions and each life cycle stage; Documented significance criteria and the scoring that applied them; List of significant environmental aspects and evidence of their communication
Common gap: Aspects limited to site operations with no life cycle perspective (procurement, use, end of life)
Framework page: ISO 14001:2026
ISO 14001 6.1.3 Compliance obligations

The organization shall determine and have access to the compliance obligations related to its environmental aspects, determine how those obligations apply to it, and take them into account when establishing, implementing, maintaining and continually improving the environmental management system. Compliance obligations can result in risks and opportunities. T...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Register of compliance obligations (legal requirements and other requirements the organization adopts) with how each applies; Evidence of access to current legal texts, permits and licence conditions; Update process and records for changes in obligations
Common gap: Register lists laws by title without stating how each applies to the organization
Framework page: ISO 14001:2026
ISO 14001 8.1 Operational planning and control

The organization shall establish, implement, control and maintain the processes needed to meet the environmental management system requirements and to implement the actions determined in clause 6, by establishing operating criteria for the processes and implementing control of the processes in accordance with those criteria; controls can include engineering ...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Operating criteria and procedures for processes linked to significant aspects, with records of control; Management of change records with consequences reviewed; Defined control or influence over outsourced processes
Common gap: Operating criteria undefined, so control cannot be demonstrated
Framework page: ISO 14001:2026
ISO 14001 9.1.1 General

The organization shall evaluate its environmental performance and the effectiveness of the environmental management system, and shall determine what needs to be monitored, measured and analysed; the methods for monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation, as applicable, to ensure valid results; the criteria against which it will evaluate its environment...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Monitoring and measurement plan naming parameters, methods, criteria, indicators and frequency; Calibration and verification records for monitoring equipment; Performance evaluation against criteria and indicators
Common gap: Monitoring limited to permit parameters, with no indicators for objectives or significant aspects
Framework page: ISO 14001:2026

AASB S2, climate-related disclosures

Attaches the cross-industry metric disclosure (scope 1, 2 and 3 under the GHG Protocol, with the location-based scope 2 figure and the contractual instruments beside it), consistency of metrics and the reporting-entity rule to every supply point, the sourcing of external metrics to the imported supplies, measurement uncertainty to the estimated ones and the targets to the largest sites. Its transition provisions are named on the regime page and not quoted, because the export does not hold them.

AASB S2 D49 Sourcing of Metrics Taken from External Sources

Where a metric is taken from a source other than Australian Sustainability Reporting Standards, identify the source and the metric taken.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Metric source register naming each external source; Citation of the source in the disclosure
Common gap: External metrics used without naming the source
Framework page: AASB S2
AASB S2 D52 Consistency of Metrics Over Time

Keep the definition and calculation of metrics, including metrics used for targets, consistent over time, and apply the restatement guidance where a metric is redefined or replaced.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Metric change log covering definition changes; Restated comparatives where a metric was redefined; Explanation of the reason for the change
Common gap: Metric redefined without restating comparatives
Framework page: AASB S2
AASB S2 DAus20.1 Reporting Entity Consistency

Prepare the climate related financial disclosures for the same reporting entity as the related financial statements unless otherwise permitted by law.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Statement of the reporting entity in the disclosures; Reconciliation to the reporting entity of the financial statements; Legal basis where a different entity is used
Common gap: Disclosures prepared for a different entity without a stated legal basis
Framework page: AASB S2
AASB S2 P29 Cross Industry Metric Categories

Disclose the seven cross industry metric categories: greenhouse gas emissions with Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 measured under the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and disaggregated as required, transition risk exposure, physical risk exposure, climate related opportunities, capital deployment, internal carbon prices, and remuneration linkage.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Greenhouse gas inventory with Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 by category; Measurement approach, inputs and assumptions documentation; Location based Scope 2 calculation and contractual instrument information
Common gap: Scope 3 omitted or limited to a few categories without explanation
Framework page: AASB S2

ISO 22301:2019, business continuity

Attaches only to the lines that name standby generation or storage as a site's continuity measure: the plan content and the recovery clause on the generator and the battery, the impact analysis on the care and unattended sites they serve, and the strategy identification where CHP or storage is the fallback.

ISO 22301 8.2.2 Business impact analysis

Use the impact analysis process to set continuity priorities and requirements: define the impact types and criteria relevant to the organization's context, identify the activities supporting delivery of products and services, assess impacts over time from disrupting those activities, fix the point at which non resumption becomes unacceptable, set prioritized...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Defined impact types and criteria approved for this organization; Activity inventory mapped to products and services; Impact over time analysis per activity
Common gap: Recovery time frames set by aspiration and never reconciled to the impact analysis that should produce them
Framework page: ISO 22301:2019
ISO 22301 8.3.2 Identification of strategies and solutions

Identify candidate strategies and solutions by the extent to which they meet the requirement to continue and recover prioritized activities within the identified time frames and agreed capacity, protect those activities, reduce the likelihood of disruption, shorten its duration, limit its impact on products and services, and provide for adequate resources.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Option analysis scoring candidates against each identification factor; Evidence time frame and capacity requirements came from the BIA; Coverage of likelihood reduction options, not recovery options alone
Common gap: Candidates assessed on cost alone at the identification stage, collapsing identification into selection
Framework page: ISO 22301:2019
ISO 22301 8.4.4 Business continuity plans

Document and maintain business continuity plans that guide teams through response and recovery, collectively containing the actions to continue or recover prioritized activities within predetermined time frames, the means of monitoring the disruption and the response, the pre defined thresholds and process for activating the response, procedures to deliver p...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Plan set with each plan carrying every required element; Activation criteria and thresholds stated in the plan itself; Interdependency and resource sections reconciled to the BIA
Common gap: Plans that cover activation and response but have no stand down, so the organization never formally returns to normal
Framework page: ISO 22301:2019
ISO 22301 8.4.5 Recovery

Maintain documented processes to restore and return business activities from the temporary measures adopted during and after a disruption.

Evidence an auditor accepts: Documented restoration and return to normal processes; Criteria for deciding that temporary measures can be withdrawn; Evidence of use, from exercises or real events, including backlog clearance
Common gap: Recovery treated as implicit once the incident is closed, with no process behind it
Framework page: ISO 22301:2019

Named references by supply

Quoted on the line whatever is ticked, for the supplies this class typically carries.

GHG Protocol Scope2-Dual-Reporting Scope 2 Indirect Energy Emissions - Location-Based + Market-Based Dual Reporting (2015 Guidance)

GHG Protocol Scope 2 - indirect emissions from purchased electricity + steam + heating + cooling. Per the 2015 SCOPE 2 GUIDANCE, organizations must report Scope 2 using BOTH LOCATION-BASED + MARKET-BASED methods (DUAL REPORTING). PURCHASED ENERGY TYPES: (1) ELECTRICITY from utility grid; (2) STEAM from district energy or third-party generators; (3) HEATING f...

Evidence an auditor accepts: Location-based + market-based calculations; REC/GoO/PPA procurement records; Quality criteria adherence
Common gap: Single-method reporting (PROHIBITED)
Framework page: GHG Protocol Corporate Standard

Requirement text quoted from the standards themselves, published at compliance.theartofservice.com, the same publisher as this register, read against the held text of each standard: our statement of each clause, not the instrument verbatim.

Findings this class can raise

Do this for every supply point on your list

Paste the list and get this reading for every line at once, with the meter, the tariff, the kWh in its meter window, the programme reading, the findings and the clause rows per regime. Eight supply points free, no account.

Build my energy register

School · Car park